Illinois Chamber opposes several measures headed for Pritzker’s desk

(The Center Square) – Illinois business groups are opposed to measures they say are prohibitive to job creators and business owners but could expand employee privacy and address political and religious speech in the workplace.

The Illinois Chamber of Commerce 2024 End of Session Report details how the actions of the state government impact members of the business community. The chamber is opposed to several bills headed to the governor’s desk for his signature.

“Advocacy is one of the Chamber’s core products and we once again worked tirelessly this year to effectuate change under the capitol dome and in every corner of the state,” Chamber President and CEO Lou Sandoval said. “We ushered in the introduction and passage of numerous legislative initiatives. And, of course, we opposed and negotiated countless bills that would have an adverse effect on business operations in the state.”

Senate Bill 2979 deals with employers collecting biometric information. The bill seeks to reform the Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), but the business community said it doesn’t go far enough.

State Rep. Jeff Keicher, R-Sycamore, explained employers may use, for example, a thumbprint time clock to prevent non-employees from entering the place of business.

“What would be the protocol in place so an employer could use a thumbprint clock and not be in violation of BIPA once this legislation is in place?” Keicher asked on the House floor.

Current BIPA language prevents the unauthorized use of biometric technology that could be used to improve security and allows damages each time such information is improperly collected without proper consent. The approved measure limits damages to only one violation per person, not per scan.

The chamber wanted to see a security exemption included, but otherwise they call the bill an improvement to the current act.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Ann Williams, D-Chicago, said businesses could still use a thumbprint time clock but the employer would have to give notice and obtain consent.

“It is notice and consent that your biometric information is being collected. I will note that while that issue comes up in the workplace setting, this is also about your face being scanned when you go to a place of business, your place of worship to really anywhere in your community,” said Williams. “Many states, your biometric information is collected without your knowledge. Here, we have the foresight to protect that information.”

Keicher also made mention that the trucking industry, which uses facial recognition technology to ensure trucker drivers are awake.

“I’m worried about a trucking firm out of Nebraska that’s taking a load out to New Jersey, transits I-80 and crosses into Illinois and has constant monitoring on the driver … they would be in violation of the BIPA statute?” Keicher asked.

Williams said that hypothetical would be a jurisdictional issue and something for the courts to decide.

“Making Illinois roads less safe was never the intent of the original BIPA language,” the Illinois Chamber of Commerce said in their report.

Concerns were also expressed about data centers fleeing Illinois because the bill enhances penalties for businesses who collect data without consent. However, in the data center’s case, most of the time businesses task the center with storing the data but there’s no real way to know if that business obtained consent first. Republicans warn data centers can’t comply with the proposed changes to BIPA.

Another bill the chamber’s report detailed their opposition to is Senate Bill 3649. The bill prohibits employers from requiring employees to attend employer-sponsored meetings designed to communicate the opinion of the employer about religious or political matters.

State Rep. Dan Ugaste, R-Geneva, said he’s all for workers’ rights but doesn’t want to limit the rights of Illinois employers and businesses.

“What about the right of a store that opens up to sell Christian, Muslim or Jewish items? Under this bill they aren’t exempted. I believe this will lead to a lot of litigation and our attorney general is going to spend a lot of time and resources defending,” said Ugaste.

After Ugaste raised concerns about religious and political organizations not being exempt, an amendment added ensures the act does not prohibit certain organizations, such as political organizations, the General Assembly or religious organizations, from requiring their employees to attend employer-sponsored meetings.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Marcus Evans, D-Chicago, said employees want to go to work and don’t want to be burdened by their employer’s opinions.

“Workers want to work and they don’t want to be mandated to attend waste-of-time meetings and they don’t want to be inundated with stress,” said Evans.

The Teamsters union urged Pritzker to sign the bill, saying it would ban mandatory attendance to employer-sponsored presentations filled with what they said would be anti-union propaganda designed to discourage organization efforts.

If enacted, employers could face $1,000 fines if they’re caught requiring employees to go to employer-sponsored meetings.